Workout
Healthy Eating
Meditation
Podcast
Authenticity
Social Service
About Us
Review Board
Editorial Process
Contact Us
Health Tracker
AI Tools
✔Fact Checked

The response of the Supreme Court to Francos and Lorenzetti for the timing of sentences and hiring

After questions from the Chief of Staff, Guillermo Francosfor the times when Supreme Court (CSJN) may take a while “to issue a sentence,” The highest court issued a report in which he detailed that this year there was a record and they reached “a total of 20,200 cases resolved”. In response to questions regarding the hires he made Ricardo Lorenzettimember of that same judicial body, also clarified that the task was carried out “with the same staffing.”

The data and cross statements arise in the midst of the discussion over the eventual arrival at the Court of Ariel Lijo and Manuel García-Mansillapromoted by the Executive but resisted by various sectors of politics, even within the ruling party.

The Supreme Court report on the cases resolved and the number of employees

“When one looks at the length of time the Court’s rulings take, it is unfortunate that it takes 15 or 20 years to issue a ruling; It’s unusual. That a process in Argentina takes 20 years is incredible, I don’t know if it can work with three judges. From the point of view of the quorum it may be possible, but in terms of procedural efficiency it is difficult for me to believe that we can have a Court with three members,” Francos had said this Thursday in dialogue with radio The Network in reference to a regulation that establishes that it can operate with three members when Juan Carlos Maqueda retires.

A day later, the CSJN released the numbers alluding to its operation and highlighted that “will close 2024 with a historical record of sentences handed down” given that “it exceeded 12,250 rulings, also reaching a total of 20,200 resolved cases”. As they highlighted, “this increase was accompanied by two concomitant circumstances: on the one hand, the Court was made up of four members, instead of the five established by current regulations.”

Horacio Rosatti and Carlos Rosenkrantz paid tribute to MaquedaRicardo Pristupluk

On the other hand, the report stated that “The staffing of the Court remained relatively stable” and explained that “as of November of this year, the active staff was 2,471 people. In 2023 there were 2,484 and in 2022, 2,446.

“In the year-on-year comparison, in 2023 the Supreme Court handed down 10,024 sentences, while in 2022 there were 8,050. But if the data goes back to 2017, the Court handed down 7,401 sentences, with a staff of 2,558 employees and full integration.”

The figures seemed to be a response to Lorenzetti’s sayings, who spoke of “incredible hires made during the year 2024.” Furthermore, as LA NACION reported, the former head of the Court accused his colleagues Horacio Rosatti, Maqueda and Carlos Rosenkrantz of acting in an “illegal” manner, threatened to file complaints and maintained that “only excessive ambition and mediocrity” They explain what is happening in the highest court.

According the criteria of

Last reviewed on

Expert Q&A

Ask a Question

Was this article helpful?

🤓

😕

Share Now:
dotdash removebg preview

FitMeMore is part of the Dotdash Meredith publishing family.

Please review our updated Terms of Service.

Fitmemore logo

The best of health & fitness platform

We do the research so you don't have to. Stay up-to-date with the latest health and fitness information.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

The FitMeMore News team takes pride in providing readers with accurate, properly sourced, and objectively analyzed content. Each news piece is stringently fact-checked by our Integrity Network, and any form of plagiarism or malicious behavior from our authors and contributors is strictly forbidden.

Our articles follow a number of key standards:

  • Each cited research and studies should come from renowned peer-reviewed journals or educational bodies. Additionally, any quoted data and figures must be traceable to its origin, while also detailing their significance.

  • Content related to treatment, medicine, and procedure must plainly specify availability, cost, possible side effects, targets, possible interactions, and unapproved usage (if relevant).

  • Every news article should have inputs from at least two authorized professionals, with corresponding qualifications and ties to appropriate associations or works.

  • The reader must be made aware of any potential conflict of interest relating to the source or study.

  • Finally, all news pieces should be supplied with enough background and context regarding the relevant topic or condition.